Ligeti´s Le Grand Macabre, Essay

Introduction

In this brief article I will be discussing several aspects inspired by La Fura Dels Baus’s production of Ligeti’s opera Le Grand Macabre, which was composed in 1977 and revised in 1996. Some of these aspects include the concepts of the libretto and ideologies behind both Ghelderode’s and Ligeti’s text, death as a new concept, or the various Renaissance influences along with the staging of this particular production.



Libretto: concepts and ideology

It would be pressing to address first Ligeti’s LGM as new music theatre for it defies the concept of opera in several ways. For the purpose of coherence and academic liability, the term opera is still used because it does not fully abandon the connotations it proposes, as I will explain in the Hyper-operatic death in LGM. Also, all these points will be related to La Fura dels Baus’s extraordinary production of Le Grand Macabre in 2011.


The opera has references to ‘pop art’ and acts as an ‘anti-anti-opera’, with music collages that, even though they refer back to the opera buffa convention, have been perceived as ironic and parodic. This was not new in the absurdist and surrealist movement of the 60s and 70s, as Everett points out, ‘… many avant-garde composers adopted parodic strategies as a form of social critique or commentary’[1]

Ligeti followed this new ideology. However, his opera LGM envisions all sort of concepts, ranging from the use of staging for narrative effect to the exploration of tonality through quotation and pastiche. An interpretation as to why Ligeti turned towards music collages has been observed by Heile and Searby on Kagel’s work ‘Ludwig Van’, where the element of familiarity stands for tradition (an interesting relation to Kristeva’s concept of chora might be enlightening). Searby adds, ‘Perhaps a work like this gave Ligeti a solution to the problem of how to explore the past without sentimentality, by dismantling it in a subversive manner.’[2]




Hyper-operatic Death in LGM

After [Kagel´s] Staatstheater, writing a ‘real’ opera seemed less sustainable than ever. The styles both of Staatstheater and his own Aventures had been fully explored. But, if one could have an ‘anti-opera’ why not also have an ‘anti-anti-opera’? Like a Houdini-like contortion, Ligeti concluded that since two successive ‘antis’ cancel each other out, an ‘anti-anti-opera’ must be… well, opera![3]

Ligeti said about the concept of the libretto: ‘“The cartoons of Saul Steinberg were my ideal: characters and situations should be direct, terse, non-psychological and startling- the very opposite of ‘literary’ opera;… the dramatic action and the music should be riskily bizarre, totally exaggerated, totally crazy’.”[4] The composer might be referring to a direct, simple on-stage image, with no intricacies to bias the audience, where the music would owe ‘“nothing to any tradition, not even avant-gardism’[5]If music removes the operatic concepts of Wagner, Strauss and Berg, its staging and other features would be freer for exploration as well. The ‘anti-anti-opera’ seems to deconstruct the pillars of opera history, since Ligeti, at the same time, wanted an opera closer to that of Monteverdi, Verdi or Rossini. Using music collages would thus not be new, but it proposes a novel direction in opera and renewed concepts within satire and irony. But as Amy Marie Bauer points out, there are still some conflicted issues, ‘I thus consider the opera as a whole from three independent but related perspectives: as parody, as allegory, and as large-scale lament whose description as “anti-anti opera” confirms its conflicted and melancholic attachment to the past.’[6]

Steinitz comments, ‘Certainly the drama is in the music, but the music is inseparably linked to the text, which needs to be directly understood.’[7] As the opera debates about the ultimate human experience, death, it had to be universal in every sense, not only with the translations[8] made but with the references to every other operatic music that preceded it. Heir of a modernist tradition, it proposes an homage and critique, from Rameau and Mozart to Stravinsky´s Mozartian pastiche in ‘The Rake´s Progress’. More than an “anti-anti-opera”, this seems like a “hyper-opera”, surpassing Wagner´s own creations as it reflects more in the vitality of humanity, and not in the vitality of mythical plot.

Death is a reality, it is chaotic and difficult, yet it is still a reality that needs no connotation but Ligeti´s own absurdist conceptuality. LGM discusses death in an innovative manner. However, after Wagner and Berg, what is there to be done? Ligeti includes every corrosive aspect of modern man in this opera. Furthermore, he unintentionally[9] questions Wagner´s serious approach to death by suggesting that death could be seen in three perspectives:
1.    - be fake and charlatanic (Chaos);
2.    - real and apocalyptic (Destruction);
3.    - or ending with resurrection (Renewal) like Mescalina.

As both Ghelderode and Ligeti were interested in Flemish Renaissance realism, Everett interprets this by using “The Triumph of Death” by Bruegel the Elder to convey the idea that, before death and horror, the human being resorts to ‘desperate acts’[10]This desperation could signify a loss of fear, implying certain positive outlook on death and thus breaking ‘down the barriers that separate the living from the dead’.[11]


In reality, there is no possible way of knowing, once we are dead, what death is. Ligeti is expanding on Wagner´s pessimism by luring the audience into decadence, where, instead of conventional dramatic climaxes, we might just simply enjoy the ride. La Fura Dels Baus makes an incredible production through the staged, giant woman as a depiction of this pessimism that underpins 20th and 21st century thought,

‘I don’t want to come over all po-faced here but that no one seemed to notice how ugly it was for a well-heeled audience to start howling and hooting with laughter at this impecunious woman’s disgusting habits was deeply depressing.’[12]

An apathetic, unhealthy grieving of oneself which, in any case, still leads you to death. This hyper-opera leaves the ending unresolved. Any situation, any life, still concludes with death: the certainty of doubt, or in this case death, is the only certitude the opera is willing to commit to, ‘Death, finally, is also the order in which one can believe’.[13]

Adorno had already stated that after the Holocaust society had moved towards a new meaning of death; a more collective yet still rather hypocritical and superficial understanding of it. Ligeti wanted to emphasize Ghelderode’s idea about the failure of death yet still add the element of doubt in the finale. He presents the final passacaglia as a moral statement, where the human being, incapable of avoiding the unavoidable, should enjoy life at its fullest. A link to Adorno is clear when he states,

‘It is an idea that is particularly topical in a civilization where at any moment the whole humanity may be destroyed. The thought of the threat of collective death is always present but we try to eliminate it from our consciousness and to enjoy to the maximum the days that are left to us.’[14]

This contemporary reflection on death, originated after the dramatic paradigm shifts caused by two world wars, has created a new sort of collective hysteria terrified by death and, at the same time, distanced from it (the technological advances of weaponry and the bureaucratic approach to war have subverted our concept of death). Precisely Claudia, the fibre-glass woman in the production of La Fura dels Baus, is a literal, direct and non-sentimental representation of death as a present, transformative and thought-provoking entity. Critics have commented the lack of irony and subtlety in this production. Nonetheless, I believe it follows Kagel’s Staatstheater bald representation of the crude reality while it still manages to arouse certain aesthetic pleasure (which would explain why the term opera is never fully erased). Furthermore, as Claudia has a stroke, her face is immobilized at the exact moment of her death, which would confirm Ligeti’s statement that, ‘…if Nekrotzar is really Death, then Death is dead, we have passed into a state of eternal life, we are in Paradise and we have lived through the Last Judgement without realising it.[15] That moment of paralysis, desperation and horror captures the viewer like Bruegel’s painting; death is not a metamorphosis but an unavoidable certainty, a static and eternal phenomenon.

Since Ligeti intended for his opera to have an ambiguous ending, this particular production plays with that idea from the very beginning. Ligeti himself agreed with Boulez’s idea that opera was dead, which could mean that this opera stands in the eternal, far beyond Wagner, Strauss, Berg or Verdi. Through pastiche and parody, this hyper-opera as new music theatre expands on a dramatic reality which is suspicious of both tradition and novelty; the idea that, ultimately, it is death what determines our path. The chaotic and crude elements in the work are manifestations of the last moments before death, before communal threat. It plays with the idea of how absurd everything would be in the wake of an apocalyptic event that erases every human trace from this earth. Under these circumstances, priorities, what we once considered essential, moral, ‘right’, are all exposed and presented as mere illusions of reason.


Renaissance Influences

There seems to be an adequate reflection of both Ghelderode’s and Ligeti’s influence of Renaissance ideals in this production, even a hint to pre-Romantic aesthetics with the grandiose figure of the woman representing Goethe’s ‘womanly eternal’. Also taken from the Renaissance, the ‘ ”womanly”, is an earthly, humanly accessible symbol for a divine eternal mystery which can only be thus indirectly suggested’.[16] Similarly, the voices from the choir coming from behind the stage evoke a grotesque deus ex machina indirectly portrayed by the music rather than the body. As previously mentioned, the production was criticised due to its lack of irony, however, there are constant suggestions to this throughout the opera. Bakhtin manages to turn this view by implying that the importance of the body conveys a totality in elements that are impossible to measure; ‘“it is a transfer to the material level, to the sphere of earth and body in their indissoluble unity”’.[17] Nonetheless, the impossibility to measure all (the main philosophical change in modernity), is ironically transmitted through Ligeti’s incorporation of Kubrick’s film Space Odyssey into the opera and the production’s lighting and staging.  

The ‘Rabelaisian’ element in Ghelderode is achieved through Ligeti’s short and fragmentary musical cells. In Ghelderode’s play, these short episodes resemble ‘loosely related tableaux,[18] which would give the opera a bigger chance to interplay with contrast and range. The Renaissance had Ghelderode in thrall because he saw in it ‘an infinitely complex and contradictory humanity’[19], given to excess and sublimity, stretched between extremes: “the ecstasy of living and the horror of living”.’[20] Ligeti’s music collages in Act II, could be perceived as exaggerated and vast; a musical tribute to excess and another reason as to why this work could be denominated a hyper-opera instead of anti-anti-opera.

Ghelderode saw in Renaissance ideals similar tendencies that are at the same time applicable to our own age: what Ligeti was trying to represent through LGM. This new age of information is strongly analogous to the unknown horizons and intellectual paradigms that were starting to flourish in the Renaissance (what eventually led to a negation of absolutisms at the beginning of the twentieth century). As Herz points out about Ghelderode, ‘that savage century so like our own… its intellectual and sensual frenzies, a century in which suffering rubbed shoulders with laughter or even engendered it. - Doubtless it was this last aspect that most keenly marked the sensibility of our author'.[21] In Ligeti, the human being becomes a menace to itself, not only a physical one but a symbolic threat too. Ghelderode, just like Ligeti, relates to the crude reality of the Renaissance period and its ideological strain; ‘the ideological menaces of the after-life, of the beyond: hell, the falling, damnations and punishments of all kinds.’[22]

In Ligeti’s music there is a heterogeneous musical texture that revises all creative opportunities held within the opposite. For instance, Ligeti writes a rondo for the organ and a baroque-style piece for the electric piano. Balazs adds, ‘It is a sort of subversion of a subversion, typical of the Ligetian spirit, which deploys in different levels of his work, with a will to explore thoroughly the upside of things and the potential of the “negative”.'[23] TThis treatment of acoustic material in Ligeti corresponds largely to those elements found in Flemish paintings that express multiple and different opposing features all at the same time.


La Fura dels Baus Production – Staging

Ligeti met with Michael Meschke, director of the Stockholm Puppet Theatre, along with stage designer Aliute Meczies and the conductor Elgar Howarth to discuss ideas. Meczies mentioned the drama by the little-known Belgian writer Michel de Ghelderode, La Balade du Grand Macabre. ‘When they met, Ligeti explained his concept of something “cruel and frightening based on the pictures of Breughel and Bosch and writers like Jarry, Kafka and Boris Vian”'.[24] Before producing the opera, Ligeti was already prepared with a selection of ideas that not only related to those of Ghelderode but expanded on them.

‘In Stockholm, the Meschke-Meczies staging of Scene 3 was undoubtedly effective, with the Black and White Ministers cast as tall Giacometti-like marionettes towering above a roly-poly Prince Go-Go, and the Chief of the Gepopo’s gumshoe attendants dressed like an aviary of twitching birds.’[25]

The original production in Stockholm dressed the characters in a sort of puppet look. Precisely Ghelderode used the image of marionettes as a symbolic base for his theatre, just as Goethe had done in 1775 for his Ur-Faust. In this production the puppet of Nekrotzar appears nearly at the end of Act II realising he has failed his mission of destruction, giving a hint to the original production and ideas of Ligeti. Founder member and director Alex Olle, in collaboration with Valentina Carrasco, thought of the image of Claudia as a physically cruel and joyous metamorphosis. Claudia depicts a metaphor of infection and purgation, which was based on the hyperrealist sculptures of Ron Mueck. Another interpretation of the female body is suggested by Carrasco when she states that, ‘The fact that it is a woman derives from the idea that the female body possesses more rounded shapes.’[26] Furthermore, the figure was able to hold actors and singers within it as it also served as a scenic space. Encompassing a macrocosm in its guts, like in the paintings of El Bosco, imaginative encounters could take place. Olle stated that Claudia is not a simple piece of atrezzo, but rather a silent protagonist in the drama; Breugheland is transformed into a live, colossal body that changes and interacts with the events that occur.




The enormous success of Le Grand Macabre portrays how relevant several of these existential issues still motivate our search for meaning. Questions such as Death and its relation to the human being, the horrible and the grotesque, or humour and satire, are universal themes we believe no longer affects our nerves. A reflection of today’s society is subtlety evoked through the mask of new music and pastiche. With this approach, the arrogance of the human being is exposed as a crude and indecent pathology where death, in a last stroke of genius, ultimately saves us from ourselves. Perhaps it is time to accept that the veil of the world has been broken, that reason has indeed produced monsters we no longer control. La Fura dels Baus’s production successfully addresses the full realisation that the human being has become disenchanted with the world. Thus, man is no longer able to see through the eyes (Plato), but conveniently shuts them while waiting for the ultimate inevitability in life: death. 




Bibliography

Attinello, Paul, ‘Imploding the System, Kagel and the Deconstruction of Modernism’, in Judy Lochhead and Joseph Auner (ed.), pp. 263 – 285, Postmodern Music, Postmodern Thought, (New York, 2002).

Bauer, Amy Marie, Ligeti’s Laments: Nostalgia, Exoticism and the Absolute, (Surrey, 2011).

Delaplace, Joseph, György Ligeti, Un Essai d’analyse et d’esthetique musicales, (Rennes, 2007).

Everett, Yayoi Uno, ‘Signification of Parody and the Grotesque in György Ligeti’s Le Grand Macabre’, Music Theory Spectre, 31/1 (2009), pp. 26 – 56.

Herz, Micheline, ‘Tragedy, Poetry and the Burlesque in Ghelderode’s Theatre’, Yale French Studies, 29, (1962), pp. 92-101.

Jentz, Harold, ‘The Place of the “Eternal-Womanly” in Goethe’s Faust Drama’, PMLA, 68/4 (1953), pp. 791-805.

Ligeti, György: Le Grand Macabre, Symphony Orchestra and Chorus of the Gran Teatre del Liceu, Michael Boder, (Recorded Barcelona 2011, 101 643, Released 2012).

Ollé, Alex and Aleu, Franc, El Gran Macabro (2009), http://www.circulobellasartes.com/revistaminerva/articulo.php?id=388 (Date Authored not stated, Date Accessed 2nd May 2016).

Sabbe, Herman, ‘Musique de la voix chez Ligeti: sense et significance’, Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap, 58, (2004) pp. 301-305.

Samuel, Claude, Ligeti, Interview, trans. By Terence Kilmartin, (1981), pp. 111 – 123.

Satory, Stephen, ‘An Interview with Gyorgy Ligeti in Hamburg’, Canadian University Music Review / Revue de musique des universités canadiennes, 10/1 (1990), p. 101-117.

Saumell Vergés, Mercé, ‘Claudia y la Tragedie Bouffe’, Cuerpo del Drama, http://www.ojs.arte.unicen.edu.ar/index.php/cuerpodeldrama/article/view/70/71 (Date Authored not stated, Date Accessed 27th April 2016).

Searby, Mike, ‘Ligeti the Postmodernist?’, Tempo, 199 (1997), pp. 9-15.

Searby, Michael D, Ligeti’s Stylistic Crisis, Transformation in his Musical Style 1974-1985, (Toronto, 2010).

Steinitz, Richard, György Ligeti Music of the Imagination, (London, 2003).

Toronyi-Lalic, Igor, Le Grand Macabre ENO, http://www.theartsdesk.com/opera/le-grand-macabre-eno , Reviews, (Date Authored 18th November, 2009, Date Accessed 27th April 2016).














[1] Yayoi Uno Everett, ‘Signification of Parody and the Grotesque in Gyorgy Ligeti’s Le Grand Macabre’, p. 27.
[2] Mike Searby, ‘Ligeti the Postmodernist?’, Tempo, 199, (1997), pp. 9-15, at p. 31.
[3] Richard Steinitz, György Ligeti Music of the Imagination, (London, 2003), p. 220.
[4] Ibid, p 223.
[5] Micheline Herz, ‘Tragedy, Poetry and the Burlesque in Ghelderode’s Theatre’, Yale French Studies, 29, (1962), pp. 92-101, at p.101: “Yet man is man only because he is able to declare what he is. The modern theatre, and much of the avant-garde along with it, is perhaps all the weaker for its neglect of this basic truth.”
[6] Amy Marie Bauer, Ligeti’s Laments: Nostalgia, Exoticism and the Absolute, p.110.
[7] Steinitz, György Ligeti Music of the Imagination, p. 223.
[8] The original German prose was changed to verse, then later translated into Swedish. In further productions it was mostly translated into English, French and Italian.
[9] In an interview, Ligeti stated he was not a profound connoisseur of Wagner’s operas.
[10] Yayoi Uno Everett, ‘Signification of Parody and the Grotesque in Gyorgy Ligeti’s Le Grand Macabre’, p. 28.
[11] Ibid, p.29.
[12] Igor Toronyi-Lalic, ‘Le Grand Macabre ENO’, http://www.theartsdesk.com/opera/le-grand-macabre-eno , Reviews, (Date Authored 18th November, 2009, Date Accessed 27th April 2016)., p. 1.
[13] Herz, ‘Tragedy, Poetry and the Burlesque in Ghelderode’s Theatre’, p. 96.
[14] Claude Samuel, Ligeti, Interview, trans. By Terence Kilmartin, (1981), pp.111 – 123, at p. 117.
[15] Ibid, p. 117.
[16] Harold Jentz, ‘The Place of the “Eternal-Womanly” in Goethe’s Faust Drama’, PMLA, 68/4, (1953), pp. 791-805, at p. 791.
[17] Everett, ‘Signification of Parody and the Grotesque in Gyorgy Ligeti’s Le Grand Macabre’, p. 28.
[18] Michael D. Searby, Ligeti’s Stylistic Crisis, Transformation in his Musical Style 1974-1985, (Toronto, 2010), pp. 30-31.
[19] Steinitz, György Ligeti Music of the Imagination, p. 221.
[20] Ibid.
[21] Herz, ‘Tragedy, Poetry and the Burlesque in Ghelderode’s Theatre’, pp.98-99.
[22] Herman Sabbe, ‘Musique de la voix chez Ligeti: sense et significance’, Revue Belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap, 58, (2004) pp. 301-305 at p. 305.  “Les menaces ideologiques d'apres-mort, d'outre-tombe : les enfers, chutes, damnations et chatiments de tous ordres.”
[23] Joseph Delaplace, György Ligeti, Un Essai d’analyse et d’esthetique musicales, p. 175. “Il s’agit d’une sorte de subversion de la subversion, typique de l’esprit ligetien, qui se deploie a differents niveaux de ses oeuvres, dans une volonte d’exploration toujours plus poussee de l’envers des choses et des potentialities du “negative”.”
[24] Steinitz, György Ligeti Music of the Imagination, p.220.
[25] Ibid, p. 235.
[26] Mercé Saumell Vergés, ‘Claudia y la Tragedie Bouffe’, Cuerpo del Drama, http://www.ojs.arte.unicen.edu.ar/index.php/cuerpodeldrama/article/view/70/71 (Date Authored not stated, Date Accessed 27th April 2016), p.3. “Y el hecho de ser mujer viene dado porque el cuerpo femenino posee formas mas redondeadas”.

Comentarios

Amanda Escárzaga

Amanda Escárzaga
PhD Musicology at Royal Holloway University of London

Entradas populares